Resource
AI brand audit checklist
Every brand using AI content tools right now is running the same experiment: different inputs, similar outputs. The tools made content faster. They also made it harder to tell one brand from another. This checklist is what we use at the start of every brand audit. It finds the drift before you can see it.
1. The swap test
Take your five most recent pieces of content: a social post, a homepage headline, an email, a deck slide, an ad. Remove your logo and company name. Could a direct competitor publish this without anyone noticing? If the answer is yes for more than two of them, you have a coherence problem. This test takes ten minutes. The results are uncomfortable.
- Strip branding from five recent content pieces
- Ask someone outside the company to identify the brand from the text alone
- Flag every phrase that could belong to three or more competitors
- Note which pieces would survive and which would not
2. Positioning in one sentence
Write your positioning in one sentence. No words like innovative, leading, solutions, or platform. If you cannot write it, you do not have a clear position. If you can write it, read it aloud to someone who does not work in your industry and ask them to explain it back. What you hear in their explanation is what your positioning actually communicates.
- One sentence, no category generics
- Readback test with someone outside the company
- Compare to your three closest competitors: does it still hold?
- Check every claim: measurable or vague?
3. The AI fingerprint
Run your last ten AI-generated content pieces through this filter. Do they start with a gerund, a question, or a numbered list? Do they use the phrase in today's landscape? Do they end with a call to action using the word journey? Any two of these is a signal. Your audience will not call it an AI fingerprint. They will just stop reading.
4. Visual coherence
Put your last 12 months of visual output side by side: social graphics, presentations, website screenshots, ads. Does it look like one brand or four? When it does not, two things tend to explain it: too many people making visual decisions, or a brand brief too vague to guide them.
- 12 months of visual output in one place
- Font usage: is it consistent or creative?
- Image style: photography, illustration, AI-generated, or a mix?
- Colour: does what is live match the guidelines?
What to do with the results
If the swap test fails, fix positioning before touching design. Redesigning a brand with an unclear position produces a more polished version of the same problem. If you find AI fingerprints, the fix is a brand voice document your tools can reference. If visual coherence is the issue, a design system is the solution. These three problems are almost always connected.
Common questions
How often should we run this audit? +
Once a year minimum. More often when AI tools are introduced into the content workflow, when the team grows quickly, or when you are entering a new market. Brand drift accelerates at each of those moments.
Can we run this ourselves? +
You can run the checklist. The limitation is that internal teams normalise their own drift. You stop noticing what has become familiar. An outside read catches the patterns you have stopped seeing. That is most of what we do in a brand audit.
What does Salt & Silicon add to this checklist? +
We add the AI workflow layer. Most audits start and end at visual coherence. We go back to positioning first, then review how the team is using AI tools and what defaults are creating the drift. The checklist shows you what is wrong. The audit shows you where it started.
Ready to start